Skip to content
Content Standards

Editorial and Medical Review Policy

We build Open ADHD for clarity, care, and evidence. This page explains how our content is created, reviewed, and updated.

Our editorial principles

Accuracy first

We prioritize clinical references and peer reviewed research when explaining screening tools and ADHD traits.

Clarity and empathy

We write for adults who may be overwhelmed. Language is clear, supportive, and free of judgment.

Plain language

We translate clinical concepts into everyday terms without oversimplifying or losing nuance.

Actionable next steps

Each page explains what to do with results, including when to seek professional evaluation.

Sources we rely on

Our screening content is informed by established clinical references and reputable public health sources.

  • DSM-5 diagnostic criteria for ADHD published by the American Psychiatric Association.
  • World Health Organization Adult ADHD Self-Report Scale (ASRS v1.1).
  • Peer reviewed research on adult ADHD, executive function, and comorbid conditions.
  • Public health guidance from national health institutes and professional organizations.

Review process

  1. 1 Research and outline each topic with primary sources and current guidance.
  2. 2 Draft content in plain language with explicit notes on limitations and intent.
  3. 3 Review for accuracy, clarity, and tone before publishing.
  4. 4 Update pages when new evidence or guidelines emerge.

We may use automated tools for spelling or readability, but final content decisions are made by humans.

Medical disclaimer

Open ADHD provides educational screening tools. We do not provide medical advice or diagnoses. Please consult a qualified clinician for evaluation or treatment.

Privacy commitment

Assessment results are processed locally in your browser. We do not collect, store, or sell personal data.

Updates and transparency

Guides include published and updated dates. When significant changes occur, we update content to reflect new evidence.

If you notice an error or a missing source, we welcome feedback so we can improve the project.